Strategic Buyers in a Sum Bid Game for Flat Networks
نویسندگان
چکیده
This note addresses scenarios of buyers purchasing rate along paths in a nonhierarchical communication network. A sum bid game is proposed in which each buyer submits a bid, also equal to a payment, and the network allocates rate in a weighted proportionally fair fashion, with the bids as the weights. This is in contrast to an itemized bid game, considered recently by Johari and Tsitsiklis, under which a buyer separately bids for rate on each link along a path. Johari and Tsitsiklis show that the worst case efficiency for allocation by strategic buyers is 75% for the itemized bid game. It is argued in this note that the sum bid game captures more fully the interactions among strategic buyers. It is shown in a simple example that the worst case efficiency for the sum bid game is zero, meaning that the cost of strategic behavior on the part of the buyers can approach 100%. It is also shown that Nash equilibria can fail to exist for the sum bid game, and the payoff function of a buyer need not be concave.
منابع مشابه
Game Study on Collusion in the First-price Sealed-bid Reverse Auction
Collusion between suppliers in reverse auctions may damage buyers’ benifits and then lower efficiency of resource allocation. Under first-price sealed-bid reverse auction mechanism, suppliers' equilibrium bidding strategy and buyers' revenue loss was analyzed considering collusion. Then some general conclusions were given: suppliers' bidding strategy is relevant to some factors such as valuatio...
متن کاملDistribution Design of Two Rival Decenteralized Supply Chains: a Two-person Nonzero Sum Game Theory Approach
We consider competition between two decentralized supply chains network under demand uncertainty. Each chain consists of one risk-averse manufacturer and a group of risk-averse retailers. These two chains present substitutable products to the geographical dispensed markets. The markets’ demands are contingent upon prices, service levels, and advertising efforts of two supply chains. We formulat...
متن کاملGame Study on Collusion in the First-price Sealed-bid Reverse Auction
Collusion between suppliers in reverse auctions may damage buyers’ benifits and then lower efficiency of resource allocation. Under first-price sealed-bid reverse auction mechanism, suppliers' equilibrium bidding strategy and buyers' revenue loss was analyzed considering collusion. Then some general conclusions were given: suppliers' bidding strategy is relevant to some factors such as valuatio...
متن کاملA single-item continuous double auction game
A double auction game with an infinite number of buyers and sellers is introduced. All sellers posses one unit of a good, all buyers desire to buy one unit. Each seller and each buyer has a private valuation of the good. The distribution of the valuations define supply and demand functions. One unit of the good is auctioned. At successive, discrete time instances, a player is randomly selected ...
متن کاملStrategic Analysis of Auctions
In many markets, transaction prices are determined in auctions. In the most common form, prospective buyers compete by submitting bids to a seller. Each bid is an offer to buy that states a quantity and a maximum price. The seller then allocates the available supply among those offering the highest prices exceeding the seller’s asking price. The actual price paid by a successful bidder depends ...
متن کامل